Cross-text multiple matching
You are going to read four extracts from reviews of a popular history book about sleep. For questions 1-4, choose from the reviewers A-D. The reviewers may be chosen more than once.
Reviews of The Broken Night, a popular history of sleep
Compare viewpoints across four writers
Reviewer A, social historian
Reviewer A comments on the book’s central claim, its sources, its style and what it offers readers.
Tobias Wren’s The Broken Night sets out to persuade us that our ancestors routinely slept in two shifts, rising around midnight to pray, talk or tend the fire before returning to bed. Readers of social history will have met this claim before; Wren dresses it up handsomely but adds little that is new. More troubling is his handling of sources. A handful of diary entries and a couple of court records are made to carry an argument about whole centuries, and counter-examples are quietly left out. That said, Wren writes beautifully: his sentences are clean, unhurried and often very funny, and the book is a pleasure to read in a single sitting. And for anyone lying awake at three in the morning, there is real comfort in learning that waking in the night may be less a disorder than an inheritance. Few self-help manuals manage to be as genuinely soothing.
Which reviewer has a different view from the others on how original the book’s central argument is?
Which reviewer shares A’s opinion of the way Wren uses historical evidence?
Which reviewer has a similar view to C about the way the book is written?
Which reviewer takes a different view from the others on whether the book will help people who have trouble sleeping?
Jawab semua 4 soalan untuk menyemak (0 daripada 4 siap)